Libraries: Community Information Centers during an Emergency

In an emergency, whether the emergency is a tornado or a pandemic, in most communities everyone knows who takes care of what:

      • Order and traffic, rule enforcement: The local police department.
      • Safety and rescue: The local fire department.
      • First aid and medical attention: The local first aid squad, clinics and hospitals.
      • Shelter: Schools and community centers.
      • Coordinating it all: Town Hall.
      • Keeping the public informed: ????? (Hint: Why not the local library?)

With the demise of local newspapers, most communities, whether the population is 3,000 or 300,000, have no place to turn for reliable information accumulation and dissemination. During the COVID pandemic, initially Americans experienced an information vacuum at the state and national level. National leaders declined to provide direction and released confusing, contradictory, and sometimes downright false information. A few state leaders, such as Governor Cuomo, became particularly famous for filling the information vacuum. However, who fills the information vacuum at the local level, especially for emergencies, such as flooding, fires, earthquakes, or tornados? Why not the local library?

Emergency action is usually well planned and coordinated. The police and fire departments as well as other first responders  work with local government to prepare for emergencies. They know what to do, they practice doing it, and they’re good at it. Thanks to that preparation, people get rescued, order is maintained, and emergency facilities are set up where and when they are needed. In addition, volunteers step forward to clear debris, fill sand bags, and help distribute food, water, and blankets.

But who informs the public? How do local residents know which roads are closed or where to go for those emergency supplies of food, water, and blankets? Who tells volunteers where they are most needed? As rules and policies change, who makes sure that average citizen knows what’s going on? Police and fire crews are all busy being first responders and there is nothing in their training or experience that familiarizes them with platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Nixle/NextDoor, or even email to effectively communicate with the entire community on an ongoing basis. Someone needs to fill the information gap, regardless of information platform. Why not libraries?

The little town of Cranbury, NJ where I live was hit by tropical storm Henri on August 22, 2021. We didn’t suffer any wind damage, but we got pounded by 9 inches of rain in an hour. The rain was so intense little Cranbury (population about 3,000) was mentioned on the PBS NewsHour and CNN coverage of Henri the following day. In addition, many towns upstream from Cranbury’s beautiful lake got almost as much rain as we did, which of course, meant we not only suffered from flooding due to the rain that fell in our own town but also from the rain that fell in other towns when it flowed down to us through the watershed. The mayor, local volunteers, and Cranbury’s Office of Emergency Management did a great job of handling the flooding, rescuing stranded motorists, and helping our neighbors and businesses near the lake. But communication was a problem. And still is.

No one knew which roads were closed and, once we found out which ones were closed, we didn’t know when they were reopened. For those of us who had to go to work, there was no way to find alternate routes with any certainty. No one really knew where to go for help, and since it was Sunday the town hall was closed. If you were personal friends with the mayor or someone on the township committee or if you knew a volunteer in the fire department, you could call them, but few of them knew the whole picture – or even many details beyond what they personally were working on. Unfortunately, if you didn’t know someone, other than for a 911 life-threatening emergency, you were out of luck. We have great first responders and an excellent library. We should put them together.

Just as the police department, the fire department, the mayor, and others spring into action in an emergency, why can’t the local library staff spring into action to provide information services? Information is what libraries are for, isn’t it, the accumulation and dissemination of information? And librarians can do most of this kind of work from home – no need to go out into the pandemic, the rain, or the wind like other first responders.

Most towns have an Office of Emergency Management (OEM) that prepares for emergencies and lays out which township organization will take responsibility for which services. Libraries should join in the planning and, whether the emergency is a storm hitting at 4:00am on a Sunday morning (like Henri) or a pandemic rolling out over many months, the library staff can quickly set up information accumulation and dissemination services, both for the first responders and the public. If library staff are part of the OEM, it would be expected of them, and first responders would coordinate with them. It would be the library’s job to figure out how to collect the information and disseminate it effectively to the entire community.

Turning the library into the community’s emergency information center benefits the police, the fire department, the medical workers, and the town hall staff as well as the community members because the first responders can focus on their jobs and the community has a place to turn for reliable, curated information.

I have no data on this but I am willing to guess that if you ask most Americans where they turn for information in an emergency, they do not think of the library. They should. Information is the heart and soul of what libraries offer their communities. Libraries should be so plugged into their communities that whenever the community needs information, especially in an emergency, the first place everyone in the community thinks of is the library.

Outreach, Marketing & Engagement in Public Libraries

Librarians frequently use the terms outreach, marketing and engagement interchangeably. Many people, not just librarians, do. However, the terms are fundamentally different, and the underlying philosophy of how a library works and participates in its community affects which term applies. It is essential for librarians, especially library leadership, to understand the differences.

Outreach: The primary – almost exclusive – function of outreach is to increase awareness within an audience. Libraries conduct outreach to make community members aware of their services and programs. The underlying objective of outreach is to increase attendance or use of existing services and programs developed by the library for the audience. Usually this is accomplished Outreach is fundamentally a PR function consisting of outbound, unidirectional communication from the library to the community.through unidirectional communications such as posters in the library, e- newsletters, social media posts, handouts available through the circulation or reference desks and blurbs or articles in local news outlets. Outreach is fundamentally a PR function. It consists of outbound, unidirectional communication from the library to thecommunity.

Marketing: The function of marketing is rarely used by libraries. Marketing has three essential parts. First, marketing is a proactive effort to identify distinct audiences within a community. These audience might be defined, for example, by age, language, education level, gender identity, political views, reading habits or any combination of characteristics. Next, marketing requires the institution to make a proactive effort to understand the wants and needs of each group it serves and what motivates the people who make up that group. Young adults uncertain about their gender identities have information interests and reading / browsing habits that are different from the information interests and reading / browsing habits of retirees with grandchildren and health problems.

Marketing also assumes that there are segments of the community that the library does not reach well, and, because they are part of the community, we should connect with them. Marketing then assumes that we may not know the people in these groups as well as we think, and we need to understand them to provide them with the programs and services they want. Therefore, we librarians need to identify the various groups in our communities, and then we need to understand them. 

Second, marketing uses what it has learned about the various segments of its community to change existing programs or develop new ones that meet the needs and interests of those segments.

The last, and not least, component of marketing is much like outreach. Marketing includes letting the community know about all these great programs and services that the library has developed for it based on what the library has learned about the various segments of the community.

Marketing is a continuous cycle of learning about the community, how it is changing and what new segments are emerging, and then adjusting the library’s mix of programs and services to meet the community’s current needs and interests. Outreach is just a piece of marketing.

Engagement: Both outreach and marketing start with predetermined assumptions about the role of the library in the community and those assumptions are made by the library. Engagement allows the community to have a bigger say in the role of the library in the community.

Engagement, like marketing, starts with identifying the constituencies within a community and then goes to them and asks them about their aspirations for their community. The community, not the library, is the center of the discussion. Instead of asking what the community wants from the library, which is the classic marketing question, the basic engagement question is what does the community want for itself. The library then has to figure out how to facilitate those aspirations.

Sometimes the best way to facilitate a community With engagement, the community, not the library, is the center of the discussion.aspiration will require the library to develop programs and services within the library with input from the community, but many times the best way for the library to facilitate a community aspiration will be to empower individuals or other organizations within the community to work towards related goals. Richard Harwood of the Harwood Institute refers to this as “turning outward”. Instead of the library looking at itself as an institution first, the library looks first and primarily at the community for a definition of what the library is and does.

The ALA has developed a program called Libraries Transforming Communities (LTC). LTC is an engagement program for libraries and includes tools and training for library staff. LTC (engagement) makes it possible for libraries to work with their communities to develop programs and services in conjunction with the community to achieve aspirations defined by the communities.

Libraries that engage with their communities not only provide programs and services defined and created by their communities, they also facilitate work done by others.

Bad libraries build collections, good libraries build services,
great libraries build communities.
R. David Lankes

 

Outreach, therefore, is fundamentally the PR function of marketing. Marketing is fundamentally the cyclical process of learning about a library’s community, building and revising library programs and services to meet the needs of the community and then using outreach to make the public aware of those programs and services. Engagement, however, puts the community front and center and calls on the library not only to build library programs and services but also to enable and participate in programs and services developed by the community itself or by other institutions. Engagement makes the library a member of the community.

Social Media as a Platform for Information Literacy Education by Libraries

Social Media is periodically used by political and social actors to arouse emotional responses to misinformation and disinformation to sow division and enhance loyalty to their own causes.

Public libraries are in a unique position to counter this practice by using the same social media tools to develop information literacy and critical thinking in the general public. A few carefully crafted, interactive campaigns could be used to engage community members and encourage them to

    • Appreciate the benefits of distinguishing between demonstrable fact, emotionally titillating fiction and beliefs.
    • Evaluate the context in which information is provided.
    • Consider the objectives, priorities and potential biases of sources.
    • Understand their own objectives in seeking, selecting and using information.

Such a campaign would require a combination of witty memes and skillfully crafted interactive tools that would both engage members of the public and instruct them in information literacy and critical thinking.

Done right, a social media campaign could develop information literacy in the public and enhance the brand of libraries as sources for and advocates of reliable, fact based information.

How would this be accomplished?

To begin with, public libraries are good at providing information, so the instinct is to take a “This is a fact and that is not” (we are the authority) approach to service. However, these days information changes and spreads at a rate that renders this approach impractical. As an alternative, consider the old adage, “Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day; teach a person to catch fish and you feed them for a lifetime.” Public libraries need to teach information literacy to the public rather than attempt to be information literacy for their communities. This has the added advantage of keeping libraries out of the fray. We can certainly have our opinions, but we make it clear that as institutions we are teaching choice, not taking sides.

In addition, public libraries need to reconsider the classroom paradigm. When teaching information literacy, classrooms are fine for K-12 or academic libraries where students are a captive audience and receptive to the instruction via classroom approach. The general public, especially working adults with kids, however, are not likely to embrace giving up an evening or a series of evenings to go to the library, sit in a classroom and be instructed on something as esoteric as information literacy.

Teach me about writing a will? Fine.
Teach me how to avoid a propaganda rabbit hole?
That’s not going to happen to me, so why waste my time?
Besides, I hated school
and I have no desire to sit in a classroom again.

Social media is a viable option. It reaches the community in their spare time wherever they happen to be, even if it’s just the 15 minutes they’re on the bus to the train station or waiting for their daughter to get out of soccer practice. It’s interactive so it can take advantage of basic pedagogical principles, and it can be entertaining so it keeps them engaged.